Zachary Svajda vs Bernard Tomic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• When it comes to second serve points, Tomic has a slight edge over Svajda, winning 46.91% compared to Svajda's 46.43% in recent form.
• In terms of returning opponents' second serves, Tomic again shows a marginally better performance, scoring 44.68% while Svajda stands at 44.02%.
• Interestingly, in first-serve returns, Tomic outshines Svajda, leading with 25.11% over Svajda’s 22.83% success rate.
• How do they compare under pressure situations? Tomic excels, saving 55.41% of breakpoints, whereas Svajda saves 52.2%.
• Looking at overall performance, Tomic has a close match win percentage in the past year at 57.33%, just below Svajda's 57.58%.
• The best playing surface differs: Tomic excels on Hard courts with a 62% win rate, while Svajda is strongest on Grass, winning 68% of his matches.
• Level of play matters: Tomic competes primarily in lower-tier events, winning 57.38% of his matches, while Svajda shows a slight advantage with a 60.53% win rate.
• In direct matches, Svajda leads, having won their only encounter, a straight-set victory in their previous matchup.
• The average duration for their past matches is 1:5:12, though both players have yet to face a deciding set against each other.
• Does experience against higher-ranked opponents matter? Svajda has faced opponents with average rankings higher than Tomic's, at 232.06 compared to 293.39.
• If a match reaches a deciding set, Tomic has a better record, winning 61% of such scenarios in recent times, ahead of Svajda's 50% success rate.
• Regarding breakpoint conversion, both players show similar skills: Tomic at 32.97% versus Svajda at 34.15%.

Editorial Prediction (August 3, 2025, UTC):

As Tomic and Svajda prepare to face off once again, subtle nuances in their performance statistics could prove decisive. Tomic holds a narrow advantage in second serve and return game stats, yet both players perform almost equally under pressure.

Svajda, however, has experience from their past encounter, having won convincingly. Moreover, he has faced higher-ranked opponents, which might prepare him better for tougher challenges.

Tomic is slightly more successful in matches reaching deciding sets, which could be crucial if this encounter is closely contested. Tomic’s advantage on a hard court surface might offer an edge, but Svajda's strength lies in adapting to various conditions.

Considering their recent records, surface preferences, and the past head-to-head outcome, Svajda appears more likely to emerge victorious in their upcoming clash.